|
|
Post by XFox Prower on Jan 9, 2004 1:37:57 GMT -5
Okay, this is important (possibly the last poll before I let this loose on the whole forum). I want everyone who thinks these are too big to give me every detail on why you think so. Is it because the width makes horizontal scrollbars on the bottom of the screen? That's because some people have images exceeding 480 pixels width in their sidnature. It would probably be wiser to clean that up rather than make the modification only available to the users with larger screen resolutions. That's the only reason I can think of them as being too big. Now it's up to you guys to explain your reasons and say what should be done.
|
|
Adilor
Independent Kitsune
Yuu-chan!!! ^_^
Posts: 234
|
Post by Adilor on Jan 11, 2004 0:59:03 GMT -5
Restricting the signature size seems like the best way to do it. If they want the avatar to work properly, they'll have to do something about it themselves instead of complaining about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ButterflyPenguin on Jan 12, 2004 10:30:52 GMT -5
Well, there are horizontal scrollbars at the bottom of my screen, but they're always there & I don't have to scroll it because I can see everything. To be honest, I'm starting to get used to the avatar's size. What does it mean to put a 480 pixel wide rule on images in signatures?
|
|
|
|
Post by XFox Prower on Jan 12, 2004 11:19:49 GMT -5
Well, there are horizontal scrollbars at the bottom of my screen, but they're always there & I don't have to scroll it because I can see everything. To be honest, I'm starting to get used to the avatar's size. What does it mean to put a 480 pixel wide rule on images in signatures? If I were to make the 480 px wide rule, that would mean that signatures can not stretch the main table. Instead of seeing vertical scrollbars for the entire page, it would be scrollbars in just the signature instead. Things would be more organized this way since having to scroll the entire page can be annoying when they can be prevented. |
|
|
|
Post by ButterflyPenguin on Jan 12, 2004 11:40:21 GMT -5
Ok, so if someone's got a really big signature, it won't take up so much space, & if you want to see it, you can scroll to look at it? And its only in the signature area? Am I right? If so, that sounds good.  Are you going to show what this will look like? |
|
|
|
Post by XFox Prower on Jan 12, 2004 19:25:15 GMT -5
I'll try to get it to work. It's must be on the Test Board before anywhere else so I should have that done soon. |
|
|
|
Post by Tails on Jan 29, 2004 18:22:51 GMT -5
Pictures in your signature that are greater than 480 pixels in width should be removed from this forum, I believe. Making these restrictions sounds like the most efficient way to stop complaining of the sonic battle avatar's size.
|
|
|
|
Post by DigiTails on Feb 2, 2004 17:28:46 GMT -5
[glow=purple,2,300]nah they shouldn't be removed.[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by XFox Prower on Feb 2, 2004 19:14:57 GMT -5
If you want to see what it's like to see what it's like to be in another resolution (without the pain of changing settings in the Windows control panel), type this in your address bar:
javascript:resizeTo(800,600)
You can change the numbers..
|
|
